Re: [LAU] Mumble Jack Support

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Daniel Worth <pipemanmusic@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, November 12, 2010 - 9:30 pm

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Daniel Worth wrote:

I'm not going to add anything because I know nothing about Mumble, but
it's perhaps worth remarking that JACK may well be the simplest and
most stable callback-based audio API I have ever used.

That doesn't mean it's easy to support: its low-latency requirements
can be difficult to meet. But it's certainly easy to _code_ if you
support a callback mechanism already, and it won't bitrot easily.

Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Mumble Jack Support, Daniel Worth, (Fri Nov 12, 5:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] Mumble Jack Support, Esben Stien, (Fri Nov 12, 10:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] Mumble Jack Support, Chris Cannam, (Fri Nov 12, 9:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Mumble Jack Support, alex stone, (Fri Nov 12, 6:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] Mumble Jack Support, Julien Claassen, (Fri Nov 12, 6:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] Mumble Jack Support, Daniel Worth, (Fri Nov 12, 6:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] Mumble Jack Support, alex stone, (Fri Nov 12, 7:11 pm)