Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, October 15, 2010 - 7:13 am

Excerpts from R. Mattes's message of 2010-10-14 22:35:56 +0200:

Using eclipse from the start might be a questionable choice, but for the
rest there's no best answer. Either take the 'take it as a given'
approach or start with explaining objects and classes and and and...

About half of my fellow students are total beginners who've never
written or even read a single line of code. To them everything is new,
and they need to filter the essentials from the distractions, so less
distractions is a real help.

> > What does the following example evaluate to?

Is this using some implicit main() or something?

> > I think there's far too much distracting mess to sort out before you

I wouldn't expect 4.2||32.1 as a result. Either interpret the whole
thing as a string, or the number parts as float or don't do this kind of
automagic conversion at all. Interpreting numbers as numbers and
interpreting numbers as string in the same statement is something I
wouldn't expect.

> Java has a defined evaluation order (JLS 15.7) - left to right, and does type

I don't know Ocaml, so no idea what the above means.

> BTW,

Which are?

Regards,
Philipp

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] OT: C or C++?, Josh Lawrence, (Wed Oct 13, 8:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Josh Lawrence, (Fri Oct 15, 12:26 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Ken Restivo, (Thu Oct 21, 12:12 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Atte André Jensen, (Mon Oct 18, 10:25 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, James Morris, (Thu Oct 14, 1:30 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Oct 14, 1:17 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Josh Lawrence, (Thu Oct 14, 3:06 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Oct 14, 4:17 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Ng Oon-Ee, (Thu Oct 14, 5:49 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Oct 14, 8:40 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Tim Clewlow, (Thu Oct 14, 12:28 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Oct 14, 1:05 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Tim Clewlow, (Thu Oct 14, 1:37 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, david, (Thu Oct 14, 8:50 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Arnold Krille, (Wed Oct 13, 11:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, , (Wed Oct 13, 10:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Folderol, (Wed Oct 13, 10:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, , (Wed Oct 13, 10:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Robin Gareus, (Wed Oct 13, 10:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Bjoern Lindig, (Thu Oct 14, 6:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Robin Gareus, (Thu Oct 14, 7:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Philipp Überbacher, (Thu Oct 14, 3:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Wed Oct 13, 9:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Oct 14, 1:11 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Joshua Boyd, (Thu Oct 14, 3:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Oct 14, 8:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: 2 minute intro to type systems (was C or C++?), Erik de Castro Lopo, (Thu Oct 14, 8:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: 2 minute intro to type systems (was C or C++?), Erik de Castro Lopo, (Fri Oct 15, 10:51 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: 2 minute intro to type systems (was C or C++?), Philipp Überbacher, (Fri Oct 15, 6:30 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: 2 minute intro to type systems (was C or C++?), Harry Van Haaren, (Thu Oct 14, 9:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Bernardo Barros, (Thu Oct 14, 4:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Nick Dokos, (Thu Oct 14, 3:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Thu Oct 14, 3:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, R. Mattes, (Thu Oct 14, 4:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Thu Oct 14, 5:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Kris Calabio, (Thu Oct 14, 5:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Philipp Überbacher, (Thu Oct 14, 6:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, R. Mattes, (Thu Oct 14, 8:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Philipp Überbacher, (Fri Oct 15, 7:13 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Simon Wise, (Fri Oct 15, 11:28 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, R. Mattes, (Fri Oct 15, 9:31 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Dave Phillips, (Fri Oct 15, 10:23 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, James Morris, (Fri Oct 15, 7:43 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, david, (Fri Oct 15, 7:21 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Philipp Überbacher, (Fri Oct 15, 7:45 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, david, (Sun Oct 17, 8:53 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Kris Calabio, (Thu Oct 14, 8:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Bernardo Barros, (Thu Oct 14, 8:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Ken Restivo, (Thu Oct 21, 12:17 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Folderol, (Thu Oct 14, 9:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Veronica Merryfield, (Thu Oct 14, 8:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Orcan Ogetbil, (Thu Oct 14, 8:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, R. Mattes, (Thu Oct 14, 8:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Philipp Überbacher, (Fri Oct 15, 6:55 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, , (Thu Oct 14, 9:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Brett McCoy, (Thu Oct 14, 9:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Orcan Ogetbil, (Thu Oct 14, 9:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, R. Mattes, (Thu Oct 14, 9:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Orcan Ogetbil, (Thu Oct 14, 9:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Chris Cannam, (Thu Oct 14, 9:23 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Thu Oct 14, 2:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Charles , (Wed Oct 13, 10:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?, Charles Henry, (Wed Oct 13, 10:07 pm)