linuxaudio.org

On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 21:25 +0000, Chris Cannam wrote:

quoted text
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Bob van der Poel  wrote:

> > Oh, and the link you post really assumes that everyone is using ELM. I

> > used that program in the 1980s ... I think this is 2010 :) Maybe I

> > need to put on my reverse-time-suit :)

>

> If you've never received a potentially embarrassing personal email

> inadvertently via a public mailing list, you clearly haven't been

> around for as long as...

>

> Hey -- hang on -- you've been around for ages!

>

> Either you're very careful and you look away discreetly when other

> people do weird things, or you've mostly been hanging out on lists

> that don't do reply-to munging.  Me, I don't really want to see

> another "hey! how are you? I'm fine, just about to divorce so-and-so"

> or "you guys really sold me out on that audio reseller deal"...  No, I

> really don't.

>

> The arguments about convenience are mostly moot, you could argue

> either side.  The difference in seriousness of the most common "user

> failure" case is the argument that surely matters most.

As well as the fact that reply-to munging removes options (reply, reply

all, and reply list ALL do the same thing).
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user