Re: [LAU] M-Audio Axiom 49

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, January 21, 2010 - 2:09 pm

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Arnold Krille wrote:

hmm - did I say anything differnt/untrue?

Maybe the word 'need' made it unclear.
Applications certainly do not generally _need_ their own
hardware preset, just _if_ a non configurable app is to be
controlled with hardware it requires a matching preset.

This preset itself may reside in the controller hardware
or in any kind of software router.

best,
d
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] M-Audio Axiom 49, Ectropic Harmony, (Wed Jan 20, 3:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Axiom 49, Arnold Krille, (Wed Jan 20, 7:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Axiom 49, Danni Coy, (Wed Jan 20, 11:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Axiom 49, David Adler, (Thu Jan 21, 2:59 am)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Axiom 49, torbenh, (Thu Jan 21, 9:36 am)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Axiom 49, Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 21, 10:56 am)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Axiom 49, Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 21, 8:38 am)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Axiom 49, David Adler, (Thu Jan 21, 2:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Axiom 49, Hartmut Noack, (Wed Jan 20, 6:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Axiom 49, David Adler, (Wed Jan 20, 4:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Axiom 49, Ectropic Harmony, (Wed Jan 20, 5:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Axiom 49, David Adler, (Wed Jan 20, 6:11 pm)