Re: [LAU] quick follow-on to the RPM2010 thread

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 - 3:59 am

On Monday 18 January 2010 20:51:23 you wrote:

Not that I particularly agree with him on this. It may be that his thinking
makes the decision easier or clearer wrt functional works but I think there
are many other considerations that make it worth while to examine the
situation wrt other types of works.

all the best,

drew
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] quick follow-on to the RPM2010 thread, frank pirrone, (Fri Jan 15, 9:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] quick follow-on to the RPM2010 thread, rosea grammostola, (Mon Jan 18, 10:26 am)
Re: [LAU] quick follow-on to the RPM2010 thread, drew Roberts, (Mon Jan 18, 3:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] quick follow-on to the RPM2010 thread, frank pirrone, (Mon Jan 18, 9:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] quick follow-on to the RPM2010 thread, drew Roberts, (Mon Jan 18, 10:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] quick follow-on to the RPM2010 thread, frank pirrone, (Tue Jan 19, 1:51 am)
Re: [LAU] quick follow-on to the RPM2010 thread, drew Roberts, (Tue Jan 19, 3:59 am)
Re: [LAU] quick follow-on to the RPM2010 thread, Atte André Jensen, (Sat Jan 16, 9:22 am)
Re: [LAU] quick follow-on to the RPM2010 thread, Daniel Joshua Worth, (Fri Jan 15, 10:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] quick follow-on to the RPM2010 thread, drew Roberts, (Fri Jan 15, 11:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] quick follow-on to the RPM2010 thread, frank pirrone, (Fri Jan 15, 10:05 pm)