Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: lau <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, January 17, 2010 - 9:54 pm

> A left fieldish memory prompts me to ask, is it the same window manager on

What about Jack version, and Jack sync mode in jack2? Everything
improved tremendously for me in sync mode.

J.E.B.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Tue Jan 12, 7:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sat Jan 16, 12:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Sat Jan 16, 2:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Folderol, (Sat Jan 16, 10:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Sat Jan 16, 11:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Atte André Jensen, (Sun Jan 17, 6:29 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Sun Jan 17, 6:37 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Folderol, (Sat Jan 16, 12:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sat Jan 16, 12:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Mon Jan 18, 1:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Mon Jan 18, 1:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Tue Jan 19, 6:00 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Folderol, (Sat Jan 16, 1:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sat Jan 16, 1:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Folderol, (Sat Jan 16, 10:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sun Jan 17, 1:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Sun Jan 17, 2:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sun Jan 17, 2:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... (backwards), cal, (Sun Jan 17, 2:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sun Jan 17, 2:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Sun Jan 17, 2:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Sun Jan 17, 9:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Mon Jan 18, 10:33 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sun Jan 17, 4:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sun Jan 17, 4:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi stands still, cal, (Sun Jan 17, 5:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi stands still, rosea grammostola, (Mon Jan 18, 10:33 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, David Adler, (Wed Jan 13, 3:47 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Wed Jan 13, 4:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Philipp √úberbacher, (Wed Jan 13, 4:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Diego Simak, (Fri Jan 15, 12:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Fri Jan 15, 2:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Diego Simak, (Fri Jan 15, 2:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Fri Jan 15, 3:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Diego Simak, (Fri Jan 15, 4:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Diego Simak, (Fri Jan 15, 5:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Diego Simak, (Fri Jan 15, 6:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Sat Jan 16, 12:19 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, David Adler, (Wed Jan 13, 11:32 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Diego Simak, (Wed Jan 13, 5:10 am)