Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: cal <cal@...>
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, January 16, 2010 - 2:53 pm

rosea grammostola wrote:

If you're using 0.051, then yes, what you're describing is possible. There's
a little story that might help explain that at https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4B517CD1.40902...

I think Will was smart enough to not use 0.051, and I think his description
fits the earlier versions and the general experience of other users.

I've actually put up an 0.053-pre1 tarball on graggrag.com, and I'm starting
to get some confidence in it.

cheers, Cal

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Tue Jan 12, 7:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sat Jan 16, 12:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Sat Jan 16, 2:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Folderol, (Sat Jan 16, 10:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Sat Jan 16, 11:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Atte André Jensen, (Sun Jan 17, 6:29 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Sun Jan 17, 6:37 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Folderol, (Sat Jan 16, 12:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sat Jan 16, 12:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Mon Jan 18, 1:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Mon Jan 18, 1:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Tue Jan 19, 6:00 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Folderol, (Sat Jan 16, 1:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sat Jan 16, 1:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Folderol, (Sat Jan 16, 10:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sun Jan 17, 1:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Sun Jan 17, 2:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sun Jan 17, 2:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... (backwards), cal, (Sun Jan 17, 2:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sun Jan 17, 2:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Sun Jan 17, 2:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Sun Jan 17, 9:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Mon Jan 18, 10:33 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sun Jan 17, 4:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, rosea grammostola, (Sun Jan 17, 4:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi stands still, cal, (Sun Jan 17, 5:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi stands still, rosea grammostola, (Mon Jan 18, 10:33 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, David Adler, (Wed Jan 13, 3:47 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Wed Jan 13, 4:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Philipp √úberbacher, (Wed Jan 13, 4:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Diego Simak, (Fri Jan 15, 12:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Fri Jan 15, 2:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Diego Simak, (Fri Jan 15, 2:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Fri Jan 15, 3:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Diego Simak, (Fri Jan 15, 4:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Diego Simak, (Fri Jan 15, 5:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Diego Simak, (Fri Jan 15, 6:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, cal, (Sat Jan 16, 12:19 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, David Adler, (Wed Jan 13, 11:32 am)
Re: [LAU] yoshimi creeps... 0.051, Diego Simak, (Wed Jan 13, 5:10 am)