Subject: Re: [LAU] jconv settings

From: Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin@...> · Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 - 11:56 pm

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Arnold Krille  wrote:

quoted text> On Wednesday 30 September 2009 23:51:08 Fons Adriaensen wrote:

>> You are both very right about this. Gold-plating the cpu socket will

>> do wonders for the light and fast bits used to convolve the first few

>> kilosamples of a long IR - being light (and thus having little kinetic

>> energy) they really need low-resistance paths. For the later parts

>> of the IR jconv uses heavy bits, and a lot of them. Having all this

>> mass vibrate can put excessive stress on you CPU.

>

> As far as I know blind-tests show that there is no statistical prove that

> gold-plating on the cpu is any better then using a melted coat-hanger.

> It all depends on whether you talk to your cpu in a nice language and treat it

> with some goodies every now and then...
What kind of goodies do you recommend?  Spilling coffee on the keyboard?

--

 joq

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user