linuxaudio.org

--0016e64beb022e938c047474ff35

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
2009/9/26 drew Roberts 
> On Friday 25 September 2009 16:56:12 Ray Rashif wrote:

quoted text
> > 2009/9/25 drew Roberts

> >

> > > On Thursday 24 September 2009 22:39:58 Ray Rashif wrote:

> > > > Even if he does not, he has the

> > > > right to determine how his software should be used, what should be

> > >

> > > patched,

> > >

> > > > what should be improved.

> > >

> > > Ah... What?!!! The right? (As in it some how has some bearing on us and

> > > our rights as users of that same software and our rights to determine

> > > such things

> > > for ourselves?) Please explain your thinking here. I can see such

> > > thinking from the non-Free world, but not sure how what I see being

> said

> > > fits in the Free world. (So perhaps I am seeing something that was not

> > > said...??

> > >

> > > all the best,

> > >

> > > drew

> > > _______________________________________________

> > > Linux-audio-user mailing list

> > > Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

> > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

> >

> > Uhh..no. He has the right in his domain. A third-party has his rights as

> > well, and that's when it's called a "fork" :) So let me simplify:

> >

> > You don't like it, then take it your way.

> >

> > We're lucky our devs are friendly. Well, most of them.

>

> I don't know if I like it or not as I was not speaking to the particular

> issue

> at hand but to the general.

>

> Below modded a bit for layour purposes:

>

> "Even if he does not, he has the right to determine:

>

> how his software should be used,

>

> what should be patched,

>

> what should be improved."

>

> Within any developer's copy of their code, I agree with the second two, but

> the right to determine how it should be used once in the hands of users?

> (If

> that is what you meant, I don't think I agree with that. If you meant

> something else, another clarification would be appreciated.

>

> all the best,

>

> drew

> _______________________________________________

> Linux-audio-user mailing list

> Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

>

Yes, I agree you've spotted my mistake there ;)
--0016e64beb022e938c047474ff35

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2009/9/26 drew Roberts <zotz@100jamz.com>
On Friday 25 September 2009 16:56:12 Ray Rashif wrote:

quoted text
> 2009/9/25 drew Roberts <zotz@10=

0jamz.com>

quoted text
>

> > On Thursday 24 September 2009 22:39:58 Ray Rashif wrote:

> > > Even if he does not, he has the

> > > right to determine how his software should be used, what sho=

uld be

quoted text
> >

> > patched,

> >

> > > what should be improved.

> >

> > Ah... What?!!! The right? (As in it some how has some bearing on =

us and

quoted text
> > our rights as users of that same software and our rights to deter=

mine

quoted text
> > such things

> > for ourselves?) Please explain your thinking here. I can see such=

> > thinking from the non-Free world, but not sure how what I see bei=

ng said

quoted text
> > fits in the Free world. (So perhaps I am seeing something that wa=

s not

quoted text
> > said...??

> >

> > all the best,

> >

> > drew

> > _______________________________________________

> > Linux-audio-user mailing list

> > Linux-au=

dio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

quoted text
> > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/lin=

ux-audio-user

quoted text
>

> Uhh..no. He has the right in his domain. A third-party has his rights =

as

quoted text
> well, and that's when it's called a "fork" :) So let=

 me simplify:

quoted text
>

> You don't like it, then take it your way.

>

> We're lucky our devs are friendly. Well, most of them.

I don't know if I like it or not as I was not speaking to t=

he particular issue

at hand but to the general.
Below modded a bit for layour purposes:
"Even if he does not, he has the right to determine:
how his software should be used,
what should be patched,
what should be improved."
Within any developer's copy of their code, I agree with the secon=

d two, but

the right to determine how it should be used once in the hands of users? (I=

f

that is what you meant, I don't think I agree with that. If you meant

something else, another clarification would be appreciated.
all the best,
drew

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@l=

ists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-u=

ser

Yes, I agree you've spotte=

d my mistake there ;)=A0
--0016e64beb022e938c047474ff35--