linuxaudio.org

Arnold Krille wrote:

quoted text
> On Thursday 24 September 2009 19:45:20 david wrote:

>> David Baron wrote:

>>> rosegarden   also does scoring. I found it nearly impossible to use for

>>> this. It is one of the most complete DAW programs in linux but is now

>>> dated, stuck with KDE3, could not run on KDE4. Being converted to QT4?

>> Yes. Although some of us do not necessarily consider QT4 a good thing.

>

> Yeah, its a pity Qt isn't ported to that Emacs-OS-thing...

>

> Seriously, its just a tool-set. It doesn't matter which brand of hammer you

> use, if you get the nail to hold the picture, all is fine. Don't dismiss the

> craftsmen for using the tools he uses.

 >

quoted text
> Some people like the fact that Qt is usable on a lot of platforms without

> changing a single line of code. Some people like the fact that it integrates

> perfectly into the host-OS gui-wise. And some people like the fact that while

> they are free to write open-source with Qt, they can also buy professional

> support from the manufacturer.

Oh, I'm not complaining about QT in general. I'm complaining about QT4

and the "forced migration" it appears to be doing to everyone. To wit, a

lot of good enhancements and bug fixing in Rosegarden is on extended

hold until the devs finish slogging through porting it to QT4.
I guess I think there should have been much more "backwards

compatibility" in QT4 ...
Now don't get me started about the waste of time/resources known as

KDE4! ;-)
--

David

gnome@hawaii.rr.com

authenticity, honesty, community

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user