linuxaudio.org

Michael Bohle wrote:
> We have good instruments like Hexter and so on, enough for music

quoted text
> production. If it is not enough for you, start to developing other

> virtual instruments. But don't look back to the proprietary shiny VST

> preset wonderland, we don't need this.

I have to disagree.
I would love to join the "we have the better way", but I can't (at least

not 100%). Sure everything from PD to phasex to ghostess to ardour is

great stuff, but the ability to 1) load a project in one go and 2)

integrate as tightly as possible with plugins attract *some* people

(obviously you're not one of them, that's fine).
NB: I did a CD last year and one this year with my electronic project,

both 100% linux. The first one was a done with a intricate web of all

the usual suspects (muse, zyn, ams, pd, ardour, phasex, ghostess,

specimen + some I forgot), the second is done in a $50 native linux

host, and it's been a much more enjoyable experience and I feel the

result is better in every way.
NB2: I'm currently on a quest to get pd/sc/csound working as native vst

plugin. Of course I don't believe in presets fits all. I personally try

to develop all my sounds myself, and would love to plug in to the power

of csound totally integrated into my host.
--

Atte
http://atte.dk   http://modlys.dk   http://virb.com/atte

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user