Re: [LAU] modular audio apps and control-communication was: off topic

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009 - 2:32 am

--0016363b7ecae85b280472a33193
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Paul Davis wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Patrick

That's the impression I got from the situation - they recognised that a
significant portion of the Max userbase were either already using Live +
Soundflower + Max (or some other kludge) or were interested in
interoperability.

This market seems pretty tightly pegged to the Apple platform. At least here
in Oz, Max users tend to pick it up at university, where there's pretty high
saturation of Apple hardware.

--0016363b7ecae85b280472a33193
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Paul Da=
vis <pau=
l@linuxaudiosystems.com
> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Patrick
Shirkey<=
pshirkey@boosthardware.com
> wrote:

integrated as possible for

i had some extended conversations with one of ableton's founders =
about
this, and he talked about it in one of my classes at the TU.
basically, they wanted to tap into the "max crowd", however you
interpret that, which they felt that Live currently didn't do. they
saw/see a lot of skill and cool stuff going on with max that can't be
done in Live. their idea seems to have been to try to integrate that
as tightly as possble into Live, so that people who create cool max
patches can use them as if they were builtin processing objects in
Live. not "max connected to Live" (which is already possible with=

JACK, and they know it). at present, there is no "distribution" s=
ystem
for those patches, but that didn't seemed to be ruled out for the
future.
That's the impression I=
got from the situation - they recognised that a significant portion of the=
Max userbase were either already using Live + Soundflower + Max (or some o=
ther kludge) or were interested in interoperability.
This market seems pretty tightly pegged to the Apple platform. At least=
here in Oz, Max users tend to pick it up at university, where there's =
pretty high saturation of Apple hardware. =A0

--0016363b7ecae85b280472a33193--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), cunnilinux himself, (Mon Aug 31, 5:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Niklas Klügel, (Wed Sep 2, 1:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Niklas Klügel, (Thu Sep 3, 7:23 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Sep 3, 12:08 am)
Re: [LAU] modular audio apps and control-communication was: ..., Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Wed Sep 2, 5:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] modular audio apps and control-communication was: ..., Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Thu Sep 3, 3:02 am)
Re: [LAU] modular audio apps and control-communication was: ..., Chris Wenn, (Thu Sep 3, 2:32 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Sep 2, 3:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Hartmut Noack, (Mon Aug 31, 9:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Rui Nuno Capela, (Mon Aug 31, 10:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Hartmut Noack, (Tue Sep 1, 3:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Rui Nuno Capela, (Tue Sep 1, 7:33 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Paul Coccoli, (Tue Sep 1, 4:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Sep 1, 1:15 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Sep 1, 10:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Hartmut Noack, (Wed Sep 2, 3:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Atte Andre Jensen, (Wed Sep 2, 3:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Niklas Klügel, (Thu Sep 3, 7:14 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Thorsten Wilms, (Wed Sep 2, 7:44 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Brett McCoy, (Tue Sep 1, 10:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Grammostola Rosea, (Tue Sep 1, 7:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Nedko Arnaudov, (Wed Sep 2, 11:25 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Nedko Arnaudov, (Wed Sep 2, 12:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Brett McCoy, (Tue Sep 1, 12:56 am)
Re: [LAU] What Live is about (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Robbert Latumahina, (Tue Sep 1, 10:40 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Sep 1, 1:20 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Ronald Stewart, (Tue Sep 1, 1:31 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Dave Phillips, (Mon Aug 31, 10:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] back on topic (ableton-like tools for linux), Ken Restivo, (Mon Aug 31, 9:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] back on topic (ableton-like tools for linux), Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Sep 1, 2:05 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Atte Andre Jensen, (Mon Aug 31, 9:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Hartmut Noack, (Mon Aug 31, 10:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Brett McCoy, (Mon Aug 31, 5:35 pm)