Re: [LAU] back on topic (ableton-like tools for linux)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ray Rashif <schivmeister@...>
Cc: LAU <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2009 - 2:05 am

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060706040403010006020806
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 09/01/2009 11:48 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:

One thing that ardour, renoise, qtractor and lmms are missing when
compared to AL is the sampler interface which is a core interface in the
live performance model that AL provides.

Seems like a big omission to me that distances these apps quite severely
from the AL model (for live performance) for anyone coming from that
system. Probably also why some people compare lmms to fruity loops
instead of AL.

I imagine it implies the apps are not designed for live object/sample
based performance for AL users.

Cheers.

Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------060706040403010006020806
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 09/01/2009 11:48 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:

It's really a fun app, just like FL Studio. There're even people
who're trying to rebrand and sell it.

Anyway, it's not really "simple". I've been arranging my synth
tracks all from within LMMS, including full support for my favourite
VSTi. And that was without any SDK very early on. That is why I don't
have Qtractor or Rosegarden in my workflow, and have grown accustomed
to managing MIDI with a separate app in an ALSA-only session.

With JACK and audio recording support, this will be just as
promising as Ardour 3.

One thing that ardour, renoise, qtractor and lmms are missing when
compared to AL is the sampler interface which is a core interface in
the live performance model that AL provides.

Seems like a big omission to me that distances these apps quite
severely from the AL model (for live performance) for anyone coming
from that system. Probably also why some people compare lmms to fruity
loops instead of AL.

I imagine it implies the apps are not designed for live object/sample
based performance for AL users.

Cheers.

Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

--------------060706040403010006020806--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), cunnilinux himself, (Mon Aug 31, 5:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Niklas Klügel, (Wed Sep 2, 1:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Niklas Klügel, (Thu Sep 3, 7:23 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Sep 3, 12:08 am)
Re: [LAU] modular audio apps and control-communication was: ..., Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Wed Sep 2, 5:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] modular audio apps and control-communication was: ..., Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Thu Sep 3, 3:02 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Sep 2, 3:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Hartmut Noack, (Mon Aug 31, 9:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Rui Nuno Capela, (Mon Aug 31, 10:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Hartmut Noack, (Tue Sep 1, 3:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Rui Nuno Capela, (Tue Sep 1, 7:33 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Paul Coccoli, (Tue Sep 1, 4:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Sep 1, 1:15 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Sep 1, 10:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Hartmut Noack, (Wed Sep 2, 3:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Atte Andre Jensen, (Wed Sep 2, 3:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Niklas Klügel, (Thu Sep 3, 7:14 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Thorsten Wilms, (Wed Sep 2, 7:44 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Brett McCoy, (Tue Sep 1, 10:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Grammostola Rosea, (Tue Sep 1, 7:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Nedko Arnaudov, (Wed Sep 2, 11:25 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Nedko Arnaudov, (Wed Sep 2, 12:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Brett McCoy, (Tue Sep 1, 12:56 am)
Re: [LAU] What Live is about (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Robbert Latumahina, (Tue Sep 1, 10:40 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Sep 1, 1:20 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Ronald Stewart, (Tue Sep 1, 1:31 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Dave Phillips, (Mon Aug 31, 10:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] back on topic (ableton-like tools for linux), Ken Restivo, (Mon Aug 31, 9:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] back on topic (ableton-like tools for linux), Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Sep 1, 2:05 am)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Atte Andre Jensen, (Mon Aug 31, 9:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Hartmut Noack, (Mon Aug 31, 10:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] off topic (was: Re: ableton live in vmware), Brett McCoy, (Mon Aug 31, 5:35 pm)