Re: [LAU] another csound vs supercollider question

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009 - 11:29 am

Hallo,
Dave Phillips hat gesagt: // Dave Phillips wrote:

> cunnilinux himself wrote:

And as both are sound *programming* languages, the speed also depends on how well
you've designed your Csound/SC programs itself.

In all these languages (and in software like Pd) you can do some terribly slow
things, but if you do them right, they may run pretty fast. I don't think,
there is much difference between SC and Csound when both just play some sine waves,
probably this is well optimized in both. I didn't benchmark it, though.

Ciao
--
Frank
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] another csound vs supercollider question, cunnilinux himself, (Thu Aug 27, 8:58 am)
Re: [LAU] another csound vs supercollider question, Dave Phillips, (Thu Aug 27, 10:48 am)
Re: [LAU] another csound vs supercollider question, cunnilinux himself, (Thu Aug 27, 12:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] another csound vs supercollider question, Frank Barknecht, (Thu Aug 27, 11:29 am)
Re: [LAU] another csound vs supercollider question, Michal Seta, (Thu Aug 27, 4:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] another csound vs supercollider question, Ken Restivo, (Thu Aug 27, 10:16 am)