Re: [LAU] state of multimedia

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Patrick Shirkey <pshirkey@...>
Cc: LAU <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, May 7, 2009 - 12:45 am

On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 06:36:01AM +0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote:

Yes, if you compile blender.

> What's the point of making a non ffmpeg

Priority? What priority? You're in control. If you want to install
Blender from source, it would use your ffmpeg package. If you choose to
install Blender from a restricted distribution, you get those
restrictions.

> Jack is included in fedora core IIUC so I have no idea why anyone would

Why not ask them? I imagine you'd find either some bug, or they wanted
to promote some other audio interface, or they've made it an optional
package.

> To me it just highlights the state of multimedia support in Fedora and

On the other hand, it simplifies the packaging, and gets the packages
out there in some form that basically works. It might not work to the
level of excellence that we demand. A dumbed down distribution.

--
James Cameron mailto:quozl@us.netrek.org http://quozl.netrek.org/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] state of multimedia, Patrick Shirkey, (Tue May 5, 7:05 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Robin Gareus, (Tue May 5, 8:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed May 6, 4:58 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, drew Roberts, (Tue May 5, 11:38 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Ken Restivo, (Tue May 5, 10:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Patrick Shirkey, (Tue May 5, 11:57 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Eric Steinberg, (Tue May 5, 5:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Raffaele Morelli, (Wed May 6, 10:06 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, drew Roberts, (Wed May 6, 2:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, James Cameron, (Wed May 6, 10:53 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed May 6, 11:03 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, James Cameron, (Wed May 6, 11:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Joshua Boyd, (Fri May 8, 5:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed May 6, 11:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, James Cameron, (Thu May 7, 12:45 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu May 7, 1:03 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, James Cameron, (Thu May 7, 1:36 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu May 7, 1:48 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, , (Thu May 7, 1:26 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, James Cameron, (Thu May 7, 2:32 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, nescivi, (Fri May 8, 2:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed May 6, 10:15 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Raffaele Morelli, (Thu May 7, 7:20 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Ray Rashif, (Thu May 7, 11:49 am)
Re: [LAU] state of multimedia, Jeremiah Benham, (Wed May 6, 3:53 pm)