Re: [LAU] jackdmp and libjack.la

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Stéphane Letz <letz@...>
Cc: Nedko Arnaudov <nedko@...>, linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, May 11, 2009 - 2:44 pm

Stéphane Letz wrote:

>> In other terms, every autoconf/automake based software which builds a

[...]

I know there's a controversy about .la files. libtool is certainly a very old
thing, and I don't like it either.

But, you should consider the fact that Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.. include .la
files for all libs, and ask yourself whether you want to maximize compatibility
with Muse and others.

And what you really should do IMO is ask on waf-users. These guys know the
problem and will tell you what's best.

--
Olivier

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] jackdmp and libjack.la (was: Jackbeat 0.7), Olivier Guilyardi, (Mon May 11, 1:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] jackdmp and libjack.la (was: Jackbeat 0.7), Stéphane Letz, (Mon May 11, 2:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] jackdmp and libjack.la, Dave Phillips, (Mon May 11, 2:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] jackdmp and libjack.la, Olivier Guilyardi, (Mon May 11, 3:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] jackdmp and libjack.la, Olivier Guilyardi, (Mon May 11, 2:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] jackdmp and libjack.la, luigi curzi, (Mon May 11, 3:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] jackdmp and libjack.la, Olivier Guilyardi, (Mon May 11, 4:10 pm)