Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6.27 RT ETA? )

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <nescivi@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 - 1:06 pm

--000e0cd2501697384f0464c36a7e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

generic or custom (rt patched) kernel?
r

2009/3/10 nescivi

>

--000e0cd2501697384f0464c36a7e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

generic or custom (rt patched) kernel?r2009/3/10 nescivi <nescivi@gmail.com>

realtime priorities were handled through limits.conf, and I am running on t=
he
Debian kernel 2.6.26-1-amd64 on a Intel Core2 Duo, T7500 2.20 GHz. (It'=
s a
Lenovo Thinkpad T61).

The previous Debian kernel 2.6.24, did give me better results with JACK, bu=
t
had problem with the serial chip driver (the FTDI), at certain baudrates.

So yes, the few xruns were problematic, since my soundtrack was the only so=
und
that was going on, and I would really like to know how I could make this
whole setup a bit more robust.

The video capturing and the visualisation are certainly less time critical,=
as
I am only deriving control data from it, and/or using it to monitor. It is<=
br>
not projected out again.

sincerely,
Marije=A0

--000e0cd2501697384f0464c36a7e--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] &gt;= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Ken Restivo, (Mon Jan 26, 9:24 am)
Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: &gt;= 2.6...., Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Thu Jan 29, 11:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] , nescivi, (Tue Mar 10, 12:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6...., Cassiel, (Tue Mar 10, 1:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: &gt;= 2.6...., Tapani Sysimetsä, (Tue Mar 10, 2:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] , David Baron, (Tue Mar 10, 2:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: &gt;= 2.6...., Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Fri Jan 30, 4:53 am)
Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: &gt;= 2.6...., Tapani Sysimetsä, (Tue Jan 27, 5:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: &gt;= 2.6...., Atte André Jensen, (Wed Jan 28, 7:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: &gt;= 2.6...., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Jan 27, 3:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: &gt;= 2.6...., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sat Jan 31, 11:59 am)
Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: &gt;= 2.6...., Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Jan 27, 3:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] &gt;= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Mon Jan 26, 8:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] &gt;= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Hector Centeno, (Mon Jan 26, 9:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] &gt;= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Cassiel, (Mon Jan 26, 9:51 am)
Re: [LAU] &gt;= 2.6.27 RT ETA?, Ken Restivo, (Mon Jan 26, 9:57 am)