linuxaudio.org

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:15:20AM +0000, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:

quoted text
> Roberto Gordo Saez wrote:

> e

>> bundled on a free (GPL or CC-BY licensed) soundfont, there were legal

>> problems in the past, see this article by Walt Gregg:

>>

>> http://freepats.zenvoid.org/walt/README.htm

>

> From the above:

> "Because of the threat of a copyright suit, however frivolous, sound samples

> from digital synthesizers are off limits."

>

> That's utter nonsense.  If I create a patch on my Ensoniq VFX and sample

> it, then *I* hold the copyright on that sample, not Ensoniq (or rather

> the company that bought the company that bought Ensoniq).

It looks that you haven't been sued yet ;-) Yes, it is completely stupid,

but I was once "kindly" contacted by a company for using their samples

contained in the ROM of a synth in a soundfont and I really have not the

time and effort to find if that is a legally valid claim or not.
They claim that you don't hold the copyright on the samples, you hold the

copyright on the composition, which is a derivative work from the

samples. The manufacturer gives you a nonexclusive permission to use

their samples in the resulting work, usually royalty free... The exact

terms vary between manufacturers, but usually they forbid to use the

samples in isolation. See this example (real, from an EULA):
"Use of the sound samples in isolation such as, but not limited to, video

game soundtracks, gaming machines, toys (where they appear in isolation

or as sound effects) is not permitted without first obtaining a separate

written License (which may not be available) from Licensor."

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user