Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question..

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Darren Landrum <darren.landrum@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 1:27 pm

--000e0cd2981af1b0ec04636db920
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Darren, that's it. I've seen a reference to it in a couple of places, and
wondered what it was.

Thanks.

Alex.

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Darren Landrum <
darren.landrum@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> Svend-Erik Kj=E6r Madsen wrote:

--=20
Parchment Studios (It started as a joke...)

--000e0cd2981af1b0ec04636db920
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Darren, that's it. I've seen a reference to it in a couple of =
places, and wondered what it was.
=A0
Thanks.
=A0
Alex.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Darren Landrum =
<darre=
n.landrum@sbcglobal.net
> wrote:

Svend-Erik Kj=E6r Madsen wrote:> Hope this can hel=
p you to understand:>> http://www.zzounds.com/item--BEHVAMP2=

#39;s Linux-related:http://vamp-plugins.org/It's a plug-in architecture=
for analysis plug-ins. To my knowledge, it
differs from LADSPA, VST, and the like by the fact that it can supportd=
ata streams beyond audio and control signals, like FFT blocks and other=
types of complex (as in complex numbers) streams.
-- Darren

- Show quoted text -
_______________________________________________Linux-=
audio-user mailing listLinux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.orghttp=
://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

-- Parchment S=
tudios (It started as a joke...)

--000e0cd2981af1b0ec04636db920--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Ok, dumb question.., alex stone, (Sat Feb 21, 12:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Florian Schmidt, (Sat Feb 21, 5:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Darren Landrum, (Sat Feb 21, 7:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Gordon JC Pearce, (Tue Feb 24, 9:28 am)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Florian Schmidt, (Sun Feb 22, 5:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., drew Roberts, (Sun Feb 22, 5:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Jack O'Quin, (Sat Feb 21, 6:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Florian Schmidt, (Sun Feb 22, 1:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Svend-Erik , (Sat Feb 21, 1:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Darren Landrum, (Sat Feb 21, 1:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Feb 21, 9:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., frank pirrone, (Sat Feb 21, 9:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Folderol, (Sat Feb 21, 10:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., david, (Sun Feb 22, 9:56 am)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., alex stone, (Sat Feb 21, 1:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., alex stone, (Sat Feb 21, 1:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Roberto Gordo Saez, (Sat Feb 21, 1:37 pm)