Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question..

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 1:23 pm

Svend-Erik Kjær Madsen wrote:

I think this might be what Alex was talking about, if it's Linux-related:

http://vamp-plugins.org/

It's a plug-in architecture for analysis plug-ins. To my knowledge, it
differs from LADSPA, VST, and the like by the fact that it can support
data streams beyond audio and control signals, like FFT blocks and other
types of complex (as in complex numbers) streams.

-- Darren
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Ok, dumb question.., alex stone, (Sat Feb 21, 12:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Florian Schmidt, (Sat Feb 21, 5:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Darren Landrum, (Sat Feb 21, 7:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Gordon JC Pearce, (Tue Feb 24, 9:28 am)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Florian Schmidt, (Sun Feb 22, 5:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., drew Roberts, (Sun Feb 22, 5:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Jack O'Quin, (Sat Feb 21, 6:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Florian Schmidt, (Sun Feb 22, 1:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Svend-Erik , (Sat Feb 21, 1:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Darren Landrum, (Sat Feb 21, 1:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Feb 21, 9:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., frank pirrone, (Sat Feb 21, 9:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Folderol, (Sat Feb 21, 10:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., david, (Sun Feb 22, 9:56 am)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., alex stone, (Sat Feb 21, 1:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., alex stone, (Sat Feb 21, 1:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Ok, dumb question.., Roberto Gordo Saez, (Sat Feb 21, 1:37 pm)