Re: [LAU] [ANN] MusE 1.0

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Linux Audio User <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 - 11:04 am

On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, sonofzev@iinet.net.au wrote:

> TMany that use MusE regularly are more concerned about jackmidi and

Actually, I'm kind of dreading KDE/QT 4, because nothing I've seen or
heard of it has impressed me. As for looking dated, these days, usually
that seems to be defined by most people as not looking like a recent
version of Windows, which also isn't something I really aspire to with
my desktop anyway.

I think I'd agree with everything you've said -- if MusE (or any app)
decided to stay on QT3 for longer, it wouldn't break my heart at all!

--
+ Brent A. Busby + "We've all heard that a million monkeys
+ UNIX Systems Admin + banging on a million typewriters will
+ University of Chicago + eventually reproduce the entire works of
+ Physical Sciences Div. + Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet,
+ James Franck Institute + we know this is not true." -Robert Wilensky
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] [ANN] MusE 1.0, sonofzev@iinet.net.au, (Tue Dec 22, 5:31 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] MusE 1.0, Brent Busby, (Tue Dec 22, 11:04 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] MusE 1.0, david, (Tue Dec 22, 7:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] MusE 1.0, Arnold Krille, (Tue Dec 22, 8:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] MusE 1.0, david, (Wed Dec 23, 7:29 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] MusE 1.0, david, (Tue Dec 22, 6:01 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] MusE 1.0, Arnold Krille, (Tue Dec 22, 10:00 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] MusE 1.0, david, (Tue Dec 22, 7:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] MusE 1.0, Hartmut Noack, (Tue Dec 22, 9:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] MusE 1.0, Arnold Krille, (Tue Dec 22, 8:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] MusE 1.0, david, (Wed Dec 23, 7:27 am)