Re: [LAU] /dev/hpet, depends on kernel?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, December 18, 2009 - 12:18 pm

On Friday 18 December 2009 01:24:48 Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:

> But I understand now that hpet may have little or nothing to do with the

I just discovered Jack2's fantastic profiling options. Have a look at:
http://www.grame.fr/~letz/Timing.pdf to see the kind of data it can give you.
Should at the least tell you if the problem is in the kernel or in userland.

Thanks sletz and others for this very useful addition to Jack!

Joakim

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] /dev/hpet is missing, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Wed Dec 16, 7:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] /dev/hpet is missing, james morris, (Wed Dec 16, 8:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] /dev/hpet is missing, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Wed Dec 16, 11:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] /dev/hpet is missing, Paul Davis, (Thu Dec 17, 3:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] /dev/hpet, depends on kernel?, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Fri Dec 18, 12:22 am)
Re: [LAU] /dev/hpet, depends on kernel?, Joakim Hernberg, (Fri Dec 18, 12:18 pm)
[LAU] 64-bit improves audio performance?, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Fri Dec 18, 4:48 am)
Re: [LAU] 64-bit improves audio performance?, Brent Busby, (Fri Dec 18, 5:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] 64-bit improves audio performance?, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Wed Dec 23, 6:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] /dev/hpet is missing, David Baron, (Wed Dec 16, 8:26 pm)