On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 04:36:30PM +0000, Folderol wrote:
> With this lack of standardisation is there any point in going for OSC
If you are comparing OSC to UDP you are comparing apples
to oranges. UDP is a transport protocol. OSC is a way to
encode events and associated data in a binary format. And
indeed there are no standards that define the meaning of
any OSC message. That again is at a different level.
And where do you get the 'quite significant overhead' ?
It just depends on how you use it.
Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga.
Linux-audio-user mailing list