Re: [LAU] Posting style (was: Re: Autotuner for Linux?)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, November 12, 2009 - 10:05 am

--nextPart1813385.ZsPm0YOiu9
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Thursday 12 November 2009 09:47:59 Jorge Salgueiro wrote:

to

But today's mail-clients are capable of detecting citations (by that nice >-
quotation markers in front of the line) and can fold these parts or format =
to=20
a smaller font-size. Why can't (screen-)readers detect and skip them?

I concur that is is a hassle if 30-mails are quoted. But the normal and=20
generally accepted behaviour is to answer below and only quote the relevant=
=20
parts[*]. And to use quotation-markers. Nothing worse then an outlook-user=
=20
answering directly inside your text without quotation-markers...

But if its better accessible for you, we can all switch to text above, full-
quote below and html :-)

Have fun,

Arnold

[*] Of course this implies that you have actually read at least the parts y=
ou=20
quote...

--nextPart1813385.ZsPm0YOiu9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkr73bgACgkQuYLL1cDjHx0qxACfWgpvdeGEBCiFDfXqnyyW/6dS
EYMAnjucPkao9JQ1uw2BcLU+a5txmTeE
=vxIh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1813385.ZsPm0YOiu9--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Giorgio - Audiophilo, (Tue Nov 10, 10:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Rob, (Tue Nov 10, 10:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Atte André Jensen, (Wed Nov 11, 7:49 am)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Hartmut Noack, (Wed Nov 11, 1:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Ken Restivo, (Mon Nov 16, 4:28 am)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Atte André Jensen, (Mon Nov 16, 7:59 am)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, , (Wed Nov 11, 10:52 am)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Atte André Jensen, (Wed Nov 11, 1:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, , (Wed Nov 11, 5:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Atte André Jensen, (Wed Nov 11, 6:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Ricardus Vincente, (Wed Nov 11, 5:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, , (Wed Nov 11, 4:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Viktor Mastoridis, (Wed Nov 11, 4:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Jan Depner, (Wed Nov 11, 5:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Ricardus Vincente, (Wed Nov 11, 5:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Nedko Arnaudov, (Wed Nov 11, 5:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Jostein Chr. Andersen, (Wed Nov 11, 5:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Wed Nov 11, 6:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, drew Roberts, (Thu Nov 12, 1:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Ricardus Vincente, (Wed Nov 11, 5:23 pm)
[LAU] Posting style (was: Re: Autotuner for Linux?), Thorsten Wilms, (Wed Nov 11, 6:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] Posting style, Lorenzo, (Thu Nov 12, 7:54 am)
Re: [LAU] Posting style, Atte André Jensen, (Thu Nov 12, 8:10 am)
Re: [LAU] Posting style, Hartmut Noack, (Thu Nov 12, 11:16 am)
Re: [LAU] Posting style (was: Re: Autotuner for Linux?), Gwenhwyfaer, (Wed Nov 11, 10:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] Posting style (was: Re: Autotuner for Linux?), Jorge Salgueiro, (Thu Nov 12, 8:48 am)
Re: [LAU] Posting style (was: Re: Autotuner for Linux?), Arnold Krille, (Thu Nov 12, 10:05 am)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Jan Depner, (Wed Nov 11, 5:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, drew Roberts, (Wed Nov 11, 1:48 am)
Re: [LAU] Autotuner for Linux?, Q, (Tue Nov 10, 11:11 pm)