Re: [LAU] usb and jack

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, October 25, 2009 - 9:18 am

On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:40:16 +0100
rosea grammostola wrote:

> Hi,

In my experience 48kHz/3 periods works a bit more stable, the possible
latency settings in jack don't really change, 64 frames is still the
lower boundary and unstable.

But I haven't heard about 2) and am very curious about this myself.

Philipp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] usb and jack, rosea grammostola, (Sun Oct 25, 8:40 am)
Re: [LAU] usb and jack, , (Sun Oct 25, 9:18 am)
Re: [LAU] usb and jack, Ray Rashif, (Sun Oct 25, 10:03 am)
Re: [LAU] usb and jack, , (Sun Oct 25, 8:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] usb and jack, Martin Homuth-Rosemann, (Sun Jan 24, 11:52 am)
Re: [LAU] usb and jack, Clemens Ladisch, (Mon Jan 25, 4:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] usb and jack, Paul Davis, (Sun Jan 24, 1:31 pm)