Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, October 11, 2009 - 1:45 pm

--0016e64cd1de79e1d90475a90738
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

2009/10/11 Dave Phillips

> I'm surprised by your comment, and I think you're reading too much into

Yes, now that I take a look at my reply again it appears to have mistaken
critique for condemnation. My bad, Dave =p

It just occured to me that everytime "LMMS" pops up here it's bombarded with
the fact that it doesn't play nice with JACK, and as such should not be
considered as a viable option for a Linux sequencing/synthesizing
application. To an extent that to someone who does use LMMS, it's FUD.

Not JACK-friendly = true
Not usable = false

Personally, it's helped me quite a lot in checking out my compositions
against SF2 banks. And back when it didn't have SF2, it served as my primary
sequencer and VSTi host (from which vestige came along). It still does.

> Frankly, if I'm writing an audio app then I would make sure that

Correct, but as you and I both know, there are developers who take the
initiative to ask for solutions and those who don't.

Anyway, you're right - I'm reading too much into it =/

--0016e64cd1de79e1d90475a90738
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2009/10/11 Dave Phillips <dlphillips@woh.rr.com>

I'm surprised by your comment, and I think you're=
reading too much into
my own.Yes, now that I take a look at my r=
eply again it appears to have mistaken critique for condemnation. My bad, D=
ave =3DpIt just occured to me that everytime &quo=
t;LMMS" pops up here it's bombarded with the fact that it doesn&#3=
9;t play nice with JACK, and as such should not be considered as a viable o=
ption for a Linux sequencing/synthesizing application. To an extent that to=
someone who does use LMMS, it's FUD.

Not JACK-friendly =3D trueNot usable =3D fal=
sePersonally, it's helped me quite a lot in c=
hecking out my compositions against SF2 banks. And back when it didn't =
have SF2, it served as my primary sequencer and VSTi host (from which vesti=
ge came along). It still does.

=A0Frankly, if I'm writing a=
n audio app then I would make sure that
critical audio issues receive the bulk of my attention. From what I've<=
br>
gleaned from the discourse here, I'd conclude that the LMMS devs do wan=
t
to improve their JACK support, but they don't know how. The LAD and JAC=
K
mail lists exist for just such a purpose, perhaps the LMMS devs can be
directed to those lists for the assistance they need.=
Correct, but as you and I both know, there are developers wh=
o take the initiative to ask for solutions and those who don't.

Anyway, you're right - I'm reading too much int=
o it =3D/

--0016e64cd1de79e1d90475a90738--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] lmms static through jackd, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Fri Oct 9, 12:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Patrick Shirkey, (Fri Oct 9, 12:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Robert Jonsson, (Fri Oct 9, 12:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Paul Davis, (Fri Oct 9, 12:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Hartmut Noack, (Fri Oct 9, 7:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Paul Davis, (Sat Oct 10, 3:43 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Hartmut Noack, (Sat Oct 10, 8:25 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Ray Rashif, (Sat Oct 10, 9:52 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, , (Sat Oct 10, 10:06 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Oct 10, 10:53 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Dave Phillips, (Sat Oct 10, 12:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Peter Nelson, (Sun Oct 11, 11:05 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Dave Phillips, (Sun Oct 11, 11:23 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Hartmut Noack, (Sun Oct 11, 6:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Oct 11, 8:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Sun Oct 11, 8:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Paul Davis, (Mon Oct 12, 10:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Oct 11, 9:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Oct 11, 10:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Ray Rashif, (Sun Oct 11, 8:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Ray Rashif, (Sun Oct 11, 11:53 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Dave Phillips, (Sun Oct 11, 12:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Ray Rashif, (Sun Oct 11, 1:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Dave Phillips, (Sun Oct 11, 2:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, drew Roberts, (Mon Oct 12, 12:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Oct 12, 4:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, drew Roberts, (Tue Oct 13, 11:25 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Arnold Krille, (Mon Oct 12, 6:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Fons Adriaensen, (Tue Oct 13, 11:58 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, drew Roberts, (Tue Oct 13, 2:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Arnold Krille, (Tue Oct 13, 1:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, drew Roberts, (Tue Oct 13, 11:30 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Danni Coy, (Mon Oct 12, 6:46 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, Ray Rashif, (Sun Oct 11, 2:28 pm)
[LAU] lmms, qsynth, linuxsampler, others, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Sat Oct 10, 5:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms, qsynth, linuxsampler, others, Paul Davis, (Wed Oct 14, 9:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms, qsynth, linuxsampler, others, david, (Thu Oct 15, 10:26 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms, qsynth, linuxsampler, others, Dave Phillips, (Thu Oct 15, 10:47 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms, qsynth, linuxsampler, others, Robert Jonsson, (Thu Oct 15, 12:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms, qsynth, linuxsampler, others, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Wed Oct 14, 10:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms, qsynth, linuxsampler, others, Frank Kober, (Thu Oct 15, 4:48 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms, qsynth, linuxsampler, others, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Thu Oct 15, 12:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] lmms, qsynth, linuxsampler, others, Paul Davis, (Thu Oct 15, 12:44 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms, qsynth, linuxsampler, others, Emanuel Rumpf, (Wed Oct 14, 7:21 pm)
[LAU] Better SF2 player wanted, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Wed Oct 14, 10:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Better SF2 player wanted, Dave Phillips, (Thu Oct 15, 10:50 am)
Re: [LAU] Better SF2 player wanted, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Thu Oct 15, 12:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] Better SF2 player wanted, Lars-Erik Helander, (Sat Oct 17, 5:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] Better SF2 player wanted, David Adler, (Sat Oct 17, 4:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Better SF2 player wanted, Emanuel Rumpf, (Sat Oct 17, 5:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] Better SF2 player wanted, David Adler, (Sat Oct 17, 5:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] Better SF2 player wanted, Lorenzo, (Fri Oct 16, 7:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] Better SF2 player wanted, David Adler, (Thu Oct 15, 12:17 am)
Re: [LAU] Better SF2 player wanted, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Thu Oct 15, 12:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] Better SF2 player wanted, Julien Claassen, (Thu Oct 15, 12:19 am)
Re: [LAU] lmms static through jackd, , (Fri Oct 9, 11:54 pm)