Re: [LAU] Problems with LV2 plugins

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, July 1, 2008 - 4:11 pm

--=-lWWrMXX13uXAn0B9Xfsb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 16:07 +0200, Pau Arum=C3=AD Alb=C3=B3 wrote:

Earlier versions of SLV2 had a bug that made it only accept LV2 plugins
where the :binary triple is in the manifest file, and all LV2 bundles in
the ll-plugins package have that triple in a separate file. I don't know
if it has been fixed in 0.5, but it definitely has in SVN.

--ll

--=-lWWrMXX13uXAn0B9Xfsb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBIae66Q3FGUATHfi4RAtCFAJ47gWijvluFO2s+tTX8EDnus7sBEwCfcP92
F22N+whLE488CDrL8Vj9LIs=
=BqG/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-lWWrMXX13uXAn0B9Xfsb--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Problems with LV2 plugins, Pau , (Thu Jun 26, 7:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Problems with LV2 plugins, Lars Luthman, (Tue Jul 1, 4:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Problems with LV2 plugins, Nedko Arnaudov, (Tue Jul 1, 3:06 pm)