Re: [LAU] rubberband and batch processing

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: M-.-n <nostromo@...>
Cc: LAU <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, June 6, 2008 - 1:02 pm

On 06/06/2008, M-.-n wrote:

In that situation (where I'm not totally confident of my syntax) I
generally just start off using "echo" or something equally innocuous
instead of the command I really want to run.

e.g. for the loop I mentioned in my previous mail, start by running

for x in *.wav; do
echo -t 0.8 "$x" "${x%%.wav}-100.wav"
done

then if that looks right, just up-arrow and replace echo with
rubberband or whatever your program is.

Doesn't work if your first argument happens to be one of those also
accepted by echo, of course. Also doesn't tell you whether you've
handled spaces in the filenames correctly or not.

Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] rubberband and batch processing, Dave Phillips, (Fri Jun 6, 12:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] rubberband and batch processing, Chris Cannam, (Fri Jun 6, 12:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] rubberband and batch processing, Jan Weil, (Fri Jun 6, 12:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] rubberband and batch processing, Dave Phillips, (Fri Jun 6, 1:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] rubberband and batch processing, M-.-n, (Fri Jun 6, 12:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] rubberband and batch processing, Chris Cannam, (Fri Jun 6, 1:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] rubberband and batch processing, Frank Barknecht, (Fri Jun 6, 2:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] rubberband and batch processing, Chris Cannam, (Fri Jun 6, 3:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] rubberband and batch processing, Jan Weil, (Fri Jun 6, 1:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] rubberband and batch processing, pete shorthose, (Fri Jun 6, 1:38 pm)