Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason? | Linuxaudio.org

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Chris Cannam <cannam@...>

To: Folderol <folderol@...>

Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?

Date: Friday, May 16, 2008 - 10:11 pm

On 16/05/2008, Folderol wrote:

quoted text

> Why would anyone want to visit yew toob while playing music.

It's a fair cop!

Well, the example earlier in the thread was about visiting YouTube
while playing an mp3. But the usual problem for me is that the card
isn't released after leaving the site either -- I do seem to go to
YouTube and similar sites often enough that it's a pain having to exit
Firefox completely before I can play another mp3 file, or (heaven
forbid) start JACK against the same soundcard.

Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Freeman, (Thu May 15, 6:18 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, James Stone, (Thu May 15, 10:45 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Julien Claassen, (Thu May 15, 6:27 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Freeman, (Thu May 15, 7:18 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Julien Claassen, (Thu May 15, 7:48 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Freeman, (Thu May 15, 8:01 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Arnold Krille, (Fri May 16, 7:37 am)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Knecht, (Thu May 15, 7:22 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Paul Coccoli, (Fri May 16, 9:03 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Justin Smith, (Thu May 15, 7:46 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Thu May 15, 8:03 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 9:19 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Fri May 16, 9:23 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 10:23 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, , (Fri May 16, 10:43 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 9:34 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Fri May 16, 9:36 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 9:51 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Folderol, (Fri May 16, 9:55 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Dave Phillips, (Fri May 16, 11:13 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 10:11 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, , (Fri May 16, 10:27 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Darren Landrum, (Fri May 16, 10:02 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Fri May 16, 9:51 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 10:06 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Phil Sexton, (Fri May 16, 10:31 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Chris Cannam, (Fri May 16, 10:51 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Sat May 17, 12:34 am)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Mark Knecht, (Sat May 17, 1:41 am)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Justin Smith, (Thu May 15, 8:16 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Joakim Hernberg, (Fri May 16, 8:06 am)

Re: [LAU] Soundcard question: Was "Equivalent to reason", J M Needham, (Fri May 16, 10:20 am)

Re: [LAU] Soundcard question: Was "Equivalent to reason", Paul Davis, (Fri May 16, 12:15 pm)

Re: [LAU] Soundcard question: Was "Equivalent to reason", J M Needham, (Fri May 16, 12:55 pm)

Re: [LAU] Soundcard question: Was "Equivalent to reason", Julien Claassen, (Fri May 16, 10:51 am)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Ray Rashif, (Fri May 16, 9:37 am)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Julien Claassen, (Fri May 16, 9:45 am)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Lee Revell, (Thu May 15, 9:43 pm)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Justin Smith, (Fri May 16, 3:32 am)

Re: [LAU] Equivalent to reason?, Salvatore Di Pietro, (Fri May 16, 10:47 pm)