Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: cdr <_@...>
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 4:59 am

> So general summary of the discussion is apart from Amarok the options

audio players is probably a more crowded category than just about everything except text editors. in the audio space im sure its even more crowded than 2-channel wave editors..

surprising you can't find something that meets your needs

maybe time to make your entry into the audio player space?

>

have you tried foobar2000 in wine? i like to use that w/ a nicce huge LP-sized album cover panel..when im not running mplayer, which is 98% of the time
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Sun Apr 27, 12:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, david, (Tue Apr 29, 8:31 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Wed Apr 30, 1:39 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, cdr, (Wed Apr 30, 4:59 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Thu May 1, 6:04 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, naysayer, (Thu May 1, 7:35 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Emmanuel Saracco, (Thu May 1, 9:41 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Thu May 1, 11:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Mon May 5, 1:59 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Mon May 5, 11:57 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Tue May 6, 12:10 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Wed Apr 30, 5:34 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Sun Apr 27, 2:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Sun Apr 27, 4:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Sun Apr 27, 7:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Sun Apr 27, 10:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Mon Apr 28, 4:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Shelagh Manton, (Mon Apr 28, 7:28 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, M-.-n, (Sun Apr 27, 2:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, pete shorthose, (Sun Apr 27, 12:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, pete shorthose, (Sun Apr 27, 8:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Anders Dahnielson, (Sun Apr 27, 12:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Sun Apr 27, 1:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Lars Luthman, (Sun Apr 27, 1:01 pm)