Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, April 27, 2008 - 8:22 pm

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:06:40 -0400
Rob wrote:

> On Sunday 27 April 2008 08:38, pete shorthose wrote:

yeah, Thunar + xmms for me. i may just be stuck in my ways though,
and no player developer can work around that.

> (I'd rather a simple, native-UI player that

retarded teenage boy skins uber alles. heh.

> Additionally, I have scripts that allow me to rip, encode and ID3-tag

i hear that. i'm gearing up to digitize my 1300 strong jazz LP collection
at the moment. even with 3 decks running in parallel, i'm looking at
over 300 hours of recording time to schedule. i inherited the collection but simply
don't listen to vinyl. ripping it is the only way i can do it any
kind of justice. (..and then, it was as if millions of vinyl enthusiasts
cried out in horror and were suddenly indignant..)

> I keep my per-song and per-album content tags in the MySQL database

the main window has player controls embedded in it though no?

i've seen numerous people claim that iTunes is the best thing since
sliced beats. never used it myself. anyone else rate it?
(sorta on topic. i think it runs in wine)

i looked at slimserver some time ago too. that was interesting but, again,
i always missed the simplicity of file browser + simple media player.

cheers,
pete.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Sun Apr 27, 12:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, david, (Tue Apr 29, 8:31 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Wed Apr 30, 1:39 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Thu May 1, 6:04 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, naysayer, (Thu May 1, 7:35 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Emmanuel Saracco, (Thu May 1, 9:41 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Thu May 1, 11:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Mon May 5, 1:59 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Mon May 5, 11:57 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Tue May 6, 12:10 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Wed Apr 30, 5:34 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Sun Apr 27, 2:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Sun Apr 27, 4:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Sun Apr 27, 7:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Sun Apr 27, 10:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Mon Apr 28, 4:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Shelagh Manton, (Mon Apr 28, 7:28 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, M-.-n, (Sun Apr 27, 2:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, pete shorthose, (Sun Apr 27, 12:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, pete shorthose, (Sun Apr 27, 8:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Anders Dahnielson, (Sun Apr 27, 12:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Sun Apr 27, 1:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Lars Luthman, (Sun Apr 27, 1:01 pm)