Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Lars Luthman <lars.luthman@...>

To: <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player

Date: Sunday, April 27, 2008 - 1:01 pm

--=-qAnzOwut6fVxQpRE3+cJ
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 14:30 +0200, Anders Dahnielson wrote:

quoted text

> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Loki Davison wrote:
> > Audacious is ok in a no organisation at all way. I like all my
> > music to be easy to search and there is 200gb of it.
>=20
> That's what Amarok is ideal for. But wasn't you freaked out by search
> in the first place?

I like Amarok too. It's huge memory footprint is annoying though,
especially on my poor old box with 512 MB RAM.

--ll

--=-qAnzOwut6fVxQpRE3+cJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBIFHkHQ3FGUATHfi4RAtgtAJ0buqfoMw/Xp3yB3746I9a2EJ412wCeL5J5
WyKJMwO+v7CdPkAG3YK8fXw=
=jPGD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-qAnzOwut6fVxQpRE3+cJ--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Sun Apr 27, 12:16 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, david, (Tue Apr 29, 8:31 am)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Wed Apr 30, 1:39 am)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, cdr, (Wed Apr 30, 4:59 am)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Thu May 1, 6:04 am)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, , (Thu May 1, 9:50 am)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, naysayer, (Thu May 1, 7:35 am)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Emmanuel Saracco, (Thu May 1, 9:41 am)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Thu May 1, 11:47 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Mon May 5, 1:59 am)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Mon May 5, 11:57 am)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Tue May 6, 12:10 am)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Wed Apr 30, 5:34 am)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Sun Apr 27, 2:23 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Sun Apr 27, 4:36 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Sun Apr 27, 7:51 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Sun Apr 27, 10:36 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, , (Sun Apr 27, 10:49 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Mon Apr 28, 4:36 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Shelagh Manton, (Mon Apr 28, 7:28 am)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, cdr, (Mon Apr 28, 7:42 am)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, , (Mon Apr 28, 9:47 am)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, , (Sun Apr 27, 2:08 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, M-.-n, (Sun Apr 27, 2:59 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, pete shorthose, (Sun Apr 27, 12:38 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Rob, (Sun Apr 27, 7:07 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, pete shorthose, (Sun Apr 27, 8:22 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, , (Sun Apr 27, 7:24 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Rob, (Sun Apr 27, 9:17 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, , (Sun Apr 27, 9:38 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Anders Dahnielson, (Sun Apr 27, 12:30 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Sun Apr 27, 1:30 pm)

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Lars Luthman, (Sun Apr 27, 1:01 pm)

linuxaudio.org

Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player