Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, April 27, 2008 - 12:30 pm

------=_Part_3195_5539245.1209299436168
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Loki Davison
wrote:

> I've been using audacious and amarok and both seem to have there

You could use "Smart Playlists > Collection > All Collection" to play the
whole collection.

> Audacious is ok in a no organisation at all way. I like all my

That's what Amarok is ideal for. But wasn't you freaked out by search in the
first place?

;-)

--
Anders Dahnielson

------=_Part_3195_5539245.1209299436168
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Loki Davison <loki.davison@gmail.com> wrote:
I've been using audacious and amarok and both seem to have there
problems. Amarok makes me think too much about searching and freaks
out parsing a lot of my collection and seem really, really stupid in a
few ways. Also i don't like it how it can't just  play from the
collection, i.e when it finishes that album, just go onto the next,
etc.  You could use "Smart Playlists > Collection > All Collection" to play the whole collection. 
Audacious is ok in a no organisation at all way. I like all my
music to be easy to search and there is 200gb of it.That's what Amarok is ideal for. But wasn't you freaked out by search in the first place? ;-)-- Anders Dahnielson
<anders@dahnielson.com>

------=_Part_3195_5539245.1209299436168--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Sun Apr 27, 12:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, david, (Tue Apr 29, 8:31 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Wed Apr 30, 1:39 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Thu May 1, 6:04 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, naysayer, (Thu May 1, 7:35 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Emmanuel Saracco, (Thu May 1, 9:41 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Thu May 1, 11:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Mon May 5, 1:59 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Mon May 5, 11:57 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Tue May 6, 12:10 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Wed Apr 30, 5:34 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Sun Apr 27, 2:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Sun Apr 27, 4:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Sun Apr 27, 7:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Sun Apr 27, 10:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Mon Apr 28, 4:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Shelagh Manton, (Mon Apr 28, 7:28 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, M-.-n, (Sun Apr 27, 2:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, pete shorthose, (Sun Apr 27, 12:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, pete shorthose, (Sun Apr 27, 8:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Anders Dahnielson, (Sun Apr 27, 12:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Sun Apr 27, 1:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Lars Luthman, (Sun Apr 27, 1:01 pm)