linuxaudio.org

------=_Part_3195_5539245.1209299436168

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Content-Disposition: inline
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Loki Davison

wrote:
> I've been using audacious and amarok and both seem to have there

quoted text
> problems. Amarok makes me think too much about searching and freaks

> out parsing a lot of my collection and seem really, really stupid in a

> few ways. Also i don't like it how it can't just  play from the

> collection, i.e when it finishes that album, just go onto the next,

> etc.

You could use "Smart Playlists > Collection > All Collection" to play the

whole collection.
> Audacious is ok in a no organisation at all way. I like all my

quoted text
> music to be easy to search and there is 200gb of it.

That's what Amarok is ideal for. But wasn't you freaked out by search in the

first place?
;-)
--

Anders Dahnielson
------=_Part_3195_5539245.1209299436168

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Content-Disposition: inline
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Loki Davison <loki.davison@gmail.com> wrote:

I've been using audacious and amarok and both seem to have there

problems. Amarok makes me think too much about searching and freaks

out parsing a lot of my collection and seem really, really stupid in a

few ways. Also i don't like it how it can't just  play from the

collection, i.e when it finishes that album, just go onto the next,

etc.  You could use "Smart Playlists > Collection > All Collection" to play the whole collection. 

Audacious is ok in a no organisation at all way. I like all my

music to be easy to search and there is 200gb of it.That's what Amarok is ideal for. But wasn't you freaked out by search in the first place? ;-)-- Anders Dahnielson

<anders@dahnielson.com>
------=_Part_3195_5539245.1209299436168--