[LAU] Decent and attractive audio player

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, April 27, 2008 - 12:16 pm

Hi all,
Well, name says it all, what do people like for an audio player?
I read this blog post and was wondering if there is something he
missed as i have somewhat similar experiences,

http://blog.brokenfunction.com/2008/04/26/why-arent-there-any-good-linux...

I've been using audacious and amarok and both seem to have there
problems. Amarok makes me think too much about searching and freaks
out parsing a lot of my collection and seem really, really stupid in a
few ways. Also i don't like it how it can't just play from the
collection, i.e when it finishes that album, just go onto the next,
etc. Audacious is ok in a no organisation at all way. I like all my
music to be easy to search and there is 200gb of it.

Aqualung seems technically just what i want, but the interface is not
my taste. I find it really ugly and a bit unfriendly.

So what are the options?

Loki
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Sun Apr 27, 12:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, david, (Tue Apr 29, 8:31 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Wed Apr 30, 1:39 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Thu May 1, 6:04 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, naysayer, (Thu May 1, 7:35 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Emmanuel Saracco, (Thu May 1, 9:41 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Thu May 1, 11:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Mon May 5, 1:59 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Mon May 5, 11:57 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Tue May 6, 12:10 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Wed Apr 30, 5:34 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Sun Apr 27, 2:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Sun Apr 27, 4:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Dave Phillips, (Sun Apr 27, 7:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Sun Apr 27, 10:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Steve Fosdick, (Mon Apr 28, 4:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Shelagh Manton, (Mon Apr 28, 7:28 am)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, M-.-n, (Sun Apr 27, 2:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, pete shorthose, (Sun Apr 27, 12:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, pete shorthose, (Sun Apr 27, 8:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Anders Dahnielson, (Sun Apr 27, 12:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Loki Davison, (Sun Apr 27, 1:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player, Lars Luthman, (Sun Apr 27, 1:01 pm)