Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, November 24, 2008 - 11:09 pm

------=_Part_130043_29099538.1227568141374
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:14:50PM -0800, Ken Restivo wrote:

Why, in this modern world, would you even think of using Mutt?

Nostalgia?

It'd seem a lot easier to use Thunderbird/Evolution if webmail isn't your
thing...

--
Christopher Stamper

Email: christopherstamper@gmail.com
Web: http://tinyurl.com/2ooncg
gTalk: http://tinyurl.com/6e359r
Skype: cdstamper

------=_Part_130043_29099538.1227568141374
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@kokkinizita.net> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:14:50PM -0800, Ken Restivo wrote:

> It was en_US.UTF-8 by default, which was wrong, wrong, wrong. en_US works fine though; problem solved.

Strange...

I've been running mutt with en_US.UTF-8 for ages.
What's wrong with it, or rather why would it work
here and not for you ?
Why, in this modern world, would you even think of using Mutt? Nostalgia?It'd seem a lot easier to use Thunderbird/Evolution if webmail isn't your thing...
-- Christopher StamperEmail: christopherstamper@gmail.comWeb: http://tinyurl.com/2ooncggTalk: http://tinyurl.com/6e359r
Skype: cdstamper

------=_Part_130043_29099538.1227568141374--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Ken Restivo, (Sun Nov 23, 10:27 am)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Tracey Hytry, (Sun Nov 23, 8:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Sun Nov 23, 4:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Roger E, (Sun Nov 23, 11:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Ken Restivo, (Mon Nov 24, 6:59 am)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, frank pirrone, (Mon Nov 24, 9:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Ken Restivo, (Mon Nov 24, 10:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Nov 24, 11:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, David Adler, (Wed Nov 26, 12:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Christopher Stamper, (Mon Nov 24, 11:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Bengt , (Thu Nov 27, 12:16 am)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Mon Nov 24, 11:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, James Stone, (Mon Nov 24, 9:16 am)
[LAU] Asus EEE 901 and Audacity, Raine M. Ekman, (Fri Nov 28, 12:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, James McDermott, (Wed Nov 26, 11:46 am)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, James Stone, (Wed Nov 26, 12:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Johannes Mario Ringheim, (Fri Dec 12, 7:57 am)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, James Stone, (Fri Dec 12, 11:28 am)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Ronald Stewart, (Fri Dec 12, 8:08 am)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Ken Restivo, (Mon Nov 24, 6:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Hakan Koseoglu, (Mon Nov 24, 2:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Folderol, (Sun Nov 23, 4:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Sun Nov 23, 4:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, carmen, (Sun Nov 23, 2:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Rob, (Sun Nov 23, 10:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, carmen, (Sun Nov 23, 11:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] Asus EEE 1000 as new softsynth?, Rob, (Mon Nov 24, 5:28 am)