Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, November 23, 2008 - 2:50 pm

Rui Nuno Capela wrote:

No lawyer here, but how can the following be illegal?

1) grab a VST plugin binary from somewhere
2) write code that makes it work

provided that the license agreement of (1) allows reverse engineering.
and that haven't EVER accepted the VST license to achieve (2).

If I strip the engine from a Porsche, then design an 'adapter' to be
able to mount it in my 2CV, that's not illegal is it? If I were to use
the Porsche maintenance manual however, it might be.

The only question I have is whether plugins exist that allow reverse
engineering. But even if the Steinberg license requires developers to
include an anti-reverse-engineering clause in their software, it's not
the users responsibility if this is not present. It's that of the
developer releasing the plugin binary or code.

In summary: if you don't accept the Steinberg license agreement, how can
you be bound by it?

Again, I'm not a lawyer. I just wonder if I can be bound to something I
didn't agree to. I might be naive, but I live under the idea that this
is reserved for governmental legislation.

Greets,

Pieter

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] VST and legal issues, Grammostola Rosea, (Sun Nov 23, 1:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, David Baron, (Sun Nov 23, 1:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, Rui Nuno Capela, (Sun Nov 23, 2:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, Dave Phillips, (Sun Nov 23, 1:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, Rui Nuno Capela, (Sun Nov 23, 1:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, Pieter Palmers, (Sun Nov 23, 2:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, Jan Depner, (Sun Nov 23, 5:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, Simon Wise, (Mon Nov 24, 3:10 am)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, Justin Smith, (Mon Nov 24, 5:36 am)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, Simon Wise, (Mon Nov 24, 7:16 am)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, Rui Nuno Capela, (Sun Nov 23, 6:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, Arnold Krille, (Sun Nov 23, 9:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, Folderol, (Sun Nov 23, 6:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, Ray Rashif, (Sun Nov 23, 1:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, carmen, (Sun Nov 23, 2:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] VST and legal issues, Damon Chaplin, (Sun Nov 23, 2:27 pm)