Re: [LAU] [OT] creative commons non-commercial licensed music - ask for advice

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2008 - 2:52 pm

Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Am Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008 schrieb Cesare Marilungo:

You can publish your works under every license you want. Can even be two or=
more licenses. So you don't need to re-license the tracks you published on=
the net, you can simply send them the tracks with a letter "I hereby grant=
them...", you can define the rules in there too (like payment).
But they probably can not make you sign a letter stating that you give them=
exclusive rights or even sell your rights to them unless you manage to remo=
all the versions from the net (and the users computers/players)...

But I am not a layer and my knowledge is _very_ small.

Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send=
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your=20
administrator to do so...

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (GNU/Linux)



Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] , thomas fisher, (Sat Jan 26, 4:59 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] creative commons non-commercial licensed musi..., Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 2:52 pm)