Re: [LAU] Convoluted Leslie?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2008 - 1:20 pm

On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 01:46:00PM +0100, hollunder@gmx.at wrote:

> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:11:52 -0800

I guess that the FR of the cabinet will not be constant but
depend on the 'phase' of the Leslie effect, i.e. the position
of the rotor. In other words, it's not only a delay modulation
but also a 'filtering' modulation.

One way to get a 'near to perfect' Leslie sound and effect
at the same time would be to measure the IR at say 30 positions
of the rotor, then use 30 convolutions and both shift and xfade
them in the correct sequence and frequency. Probably not easy
but it can be done.

If the Leslie effect is already done in softwared, you'd need some
'average' IR of the cabinet to add 'the wood'.

Just drop me a line if you need help in using Aliki to capture
the IR(s).

--
FA

Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
Parma, Italia

Lascia la spina, cogli la rosa.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Convoluted Leslie?, Ken Restivo, (Tue Jan 22, 6:12 am)
Re: [LAU] Convoluted Leslie?, , (Thu Jan 24, 12:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] Convoluted Leslie?, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Jan 24, 1:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Convoluted Leslie?, Ken Restivo, (Sat Jan 26, 2:10 am)
Re: [LAU] Convoluted Leslie?, thomas fisher, (Sat Jan 26, 5:23 am)
Re: [LAU] Convoluted Leslie?, philicorda, (Sat Jan 26, 4:28 pm)