Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2008 - 9:05 am

Am Donnerstag 24 Januar 2008 02:28:06 schrieb Dominic Sacré:

Hi Dominic,

I realised that when using 128 Frames per Period instead of 64, it works
perfectly. At least it did for like three hours yesterday evening. It's a
great tool for composing, I think!

See below for the output.

Viele Grüße
Matthias

(gdb) thread apply all bt

Thread 2 (process 5965):
#0 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0xb7d05e96 in nanosleep () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 0xb7d3fb3c in usleep () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#3 0x0804ab80 in Klick::run (this=0x807a008) at klick.cc:174
#4 0x0804a8bb in main (argc=8, argv=0xbffc1784) at main.cc:39

Thread 1 (process 5968):
#0 0x08051ce6 in AudioInterface::process_mix_samples (this=0x807a138,
dest=0xb7c24000, src=0x807b8f8,
length=2122, volume=1) at audio_interface.cc:197
#1 0x08051ef2 in AudioInterface::process_mix (this=0x807a138,
buffer=0xb7c13a00, nframes=64)
---Type to continue, or q to quit---
at audio_interface.cc:181
#2 0x08051ff9 in AudioInterface::process_callback_ (nframes=64,
arg=0x807a138) at audio_interface.cc:139
#3 0xb7f81f09 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libjack.so.0
#4 0x00000040 in ?? ()
#5 0x0807a138 in ?? ()
#6 0x000003e8 in ?? ()
#7 0x00000003 in ?? ()
#8 0x00000000 in ?? ()
(gdb)

# Additionally, here's the jack message:

subgraph starting at qjackctl-5885 timed out (subgraph_wait_fd=20, status = 0,
state = Finished)
09:51:18.046 Audio connection graph change.
09:51:18.046 XRUN callback (1).
**** alsa_pcm: xrun of at least 1998.404 msecs
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Dominic , (Mon Dec 3, 12:50 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Matthias , (Wed Jan 23, 9:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Dominic , (Thu Jan 24, 1:35 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Matthias , (Thu Jan 24, 9:05 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Dominic , (Sun Jan 27, 11:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Matthias , (Mon Dec 3, 1:52 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Ken Restivo, (Thu Dec 6, 4:55 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Dominic , (Thu Dec 6, 6:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Loki Davison, (Wed Dec 12, 2:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Julien Claassen, (Wed Dec 12, 5:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Dominic , (Thu Dec 13, 12:26 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Ken Restivo, (Sun Dec 16, 8:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Dominic , (Sun Dec 16, 11:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, porl sheean, (Mon Dec 17, 12:24 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Geoff Beasley, (Thu Dec 13, 12:30 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Dominic Sacré, (Mon Dec 3, 10:54 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Julien Claassen, (Mon Dec 3, 12:54 am)