Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - 7:12 pm

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:58:36 -0600
"Bearcat M. Sandor" wrote:

> What makes a consumer level pre-amp different? I know some pre-amps "pop" and

Some old valve (tube) amplifiers were vunerable to pulses due to
the back emf effects of output transformers and marginal stability.
Early transistors were delicate beasties and often worked at their
limits, so were also vulnerable. Unless you are using total crap, no
amplifier less than about 30 years old should have any problem at all
with pulses, DC shifts or raw mains stuffed up the input.

Speaker manufacturers lie.

In case you missed that: Speaker manufacturers lie.

Most speakers have absolutely nowhere near their quoted power rating
(apart from PA etc.)

If you drive a *real* 50W speaker from a 50W amplifer, it is impossible
for any signal passing though the amp to damage the speaker.

'instantaneous power' is what they are quoting, a meaningless figure
invented by the marketing droids. It is supposed to be a 1 cycle and
the power is calculated from the difference between peak positive
voltage x current to the peak negative voltage x current. The
frequency of the signal and waveshape are usually NOT quoted.

Very occasionally they will be honest enough to give you an RMS
figure, but don't mention the frequency or duration.

The only trustworthy spec is *continuous* sinewave power with either a
given centre frequency or better still, 'full power bandwidth'

If your speakers and amplifiers are properly matched the amp should not
deliver any significant out-of-band power to the speaker, so should
have adequate low and high pass filters. Many do not.

I feel better now. I'll go and make a cup of coffee :)

--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Mon Sep 17, 3:47 am)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Frank Barknecht, (Mon Sep 17, 8:26 am)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Folderol, (Mon Sep 17, 4:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Mon Sep 17, 4:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Ken Restivo, (Tue Sep 18, 5:14 am)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Tue Sep 18, 5:58 am)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Folderol, (Tue Sep 18, 7:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Joe Hartley, (Mon Sep 17, 4:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Mon Sep 17, 3:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Arnold Krille, (Mon Sep 17, 5:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Bearcat M. Sandor, (Mon Sep 17, 5:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Sep 17, 6:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Frank Barknecht, (Mon Sep 17, 4:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Loki Davison, (Mon Sep 17, 5:26 am)
Re: [LAU] M-Audio Audiophile Line Level Inputs, Arnold Krille, (Mon Sep 17, 7:56 am)