Re: [LAU] Important test:

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, September 15, 2007 - 10:08 pm

thanks for the test Wolfy; sorry 'bout your ears !
btw, i ididn't expect you to listen to the code just to analyze the recorded
result !

i did mention the bit's and pieces on the bottom of the email though not very
thorough.

all interupts are the best they can be. i don't suspect HW; the fact that the
wave flatlines is proof the card is recording "time". if it were interupts
then you would lose time.it's the program material that's being interupted
here.... though i do see "broken" waves very occasionally which is what you'd
see with interupt trouble. it's more like a jack dropout to me but i can't
see how they are happening. i wondered about qjackctl's patchbay's auto
function.... i need to do more tests.

best,

g.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] [music] recent ideas, julien lociuro, (Sat Sep 15, 2:39 am)
Re: [LAU] [music] recent ideas, Thorsten Wilms, (Sat Sep 15, 5:22 pm)
[LAU] Important test:, Geoff Beasley, (Sat Sep 15, 4:04 am)
Re: [LAU] Important test:, Florian Schmidt, (Sat Sep 15, 11:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Important test:SOLUTION !!!, Geoff Beasley, (Sun Sep 16, 3:08 am)
Re: [LAU] Important test:SOLUTION !!!, Ken Restivo, (Sun Sep 16, 4:19 am)
Re: [LAU] Important test:SOLUTION !!!, Paul Davis, (Sun Sep 16, 1:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] Important test:, James Stone, (Sat Sep 15, 11:02 am)
Re: [LAU] Important test:, Wolfgang Woehl, (Sat Sep 15, 10:48 am)
Re: [LAU] Important test:, Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Sep 15, 3:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] Important test:, James Stone, (Sat Sep 15, 11:01 am)
Re: [LAU] Important test:, Wolfgang Woehl, (Sat Sep 15, 11:18 am)
Re: [LAU] Important test:, Geoff Beasley, (Sat Sep 15, 10:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] Important test:, Geoff Beasley, (Sat Sep 15, 10:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Important test:, david, (Sat Sep 15, 6:18 am)