Re: [LAU] Progressive Quantisation

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, September 15, 2007 - 5:04 pm

On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 09:07:52PM +0100, Folderol wrote:

> However, I don't see how to resolve the problem of a rouge note that

If the loop is just the track the overall tempo (rather than responding
immediately to sudden tempo changes - a different and more difficult
problem) then its bandwidth can be small, and an occasional off-beat
note will not disturb it very much.

But the best solution would be to build some 'intelligence' into the
detector, making it actively decide to ignore certain events that
don't fit the expected pattern. If the processing is on a file rather
than in real time you can also include techniques such as backtracking
- reviewing an earlier decision, and awareness of higher level structure
and musical expression. This is also the solution to the more difficult
problem of tracking sudden tempo changes as occur for example in the
interpretation classical music.

--
FA

Follie! Follie! Delirio vano รจ questo !

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RE: [LAU] Progressive Quantisation, Nick Copeland, (Tue Aug 21, 10:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Progressive Quantisation, Bob van der Poel, (Tue Aug 21, 11:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Progressive Quantisation, Folderol, (Wed Aug 29, 10:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Progressive Quantisation, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Aug 29, 10:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] Progressive Quantisation , Kevin Cosgrove, (Thu Aug 30, 3:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] Progressive Quantisation, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Aug 30, 4:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] Progressive Quantisation, Folderol, (Sun Sep 2, 8:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] Progressive Quantisation, Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Sep 15, 5:04 pm)