Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Fons Adriaensen <fons@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, August 24, 2007 - 4:30 pm

Thank you Fons for your commentaries,

I thought about the software option so that's why I've been unsuccessfully
trying to build jack_mixer (I have to build from SVN but there is no
autogen.sh script and autoconf is not working). I like the fact that
jack_mixer has midi control so I can use a external midi controller to
change the levels... but the problem is that if I lower the volume on the
software side and I increase the level on the monitors, then I start hearin=
g
a lot of noise mixed with the (now lower) sound signal (since the analog ou=
t
of the FA-101 is still high). This is why I thought an analog mixer between
the FA's outs and the monitors would be better. I researched the XLR
attenuators and I found that paying for two of those (around $35CAN each)
has a higher price than a small mixer (e.g. the Behringer XENYX 502 for
$57CAN), but maybe there are cheaper attenuators around, I'll take a look
(thanks for telling me about them, I didn't thought about it).

If the software solution was the right one, it would be nice if Qjackctl ha=
d
a simple mixer for the outputs that remembered settings so each time you
start it you don't have to worry about opening another mixer application an=
d
dealing with all the software connections... but I guess I could just have =
a
script that runs each time Jack is started.

Cheers!

Hector

On 8/24/07, Fons Adriaensen wrote:

s

--=20
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
http://www.hcenteno.net

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Hector Centeno, (Sun Aug 19, 11:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Daniel Wagner, (Mon Aug 20, 7:37 am)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Hector Centeno, (Mon Aug 20, 1:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Hector Centeno, (Mon Aug 20, 2:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Daniel Wagner, (Tue Aug 21, 9:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Hector Centeno, (Wed Aug 22, 10:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Daniel Wagner, (Thu Aug 23, 6:50 am)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Ken Restivo, (Fri Aug 24, 12:00 am)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Hector Centeno, (Fri Aug 24, 12:40 am)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Hector Centeno, (Fri Aug 24, 6:15 am)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Fons Adriaensen, (Fri Aug 24, 9:07 am)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Hector Centeno, (Fri Aug 24, 4:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Fons Adriaensen, (Fri Aug 24, 9:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, david, (Sat Aug 25, 9:28 am)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Aug 25, 9:58 am)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Hector Centeno, (Sat Aug 25, 5:08 am)
[LAU] Categorizing Ladspa plugins?, Matthias , (Fri Aug 24, 10:00 am)
Re: [LAU] Categorizing Ladspa plugins?, Myk, (Sat Aug 25, 8:53 am)
Re: [LAU] Categorizing Ladspa plugins?, Matthias , (Sat Aug 25, 9:21 am)
Re: [LAU] Categorizing Ladspa plugins?, Myk, (Sat Aug 25, 9:18 am)
Re: [LAU] Categorizing Ladspa plugins?, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Aug 27, 2:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] Categorizing Ladspa plugins?, Matthias , (Mon Aug 27, 3:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] Categorizing Ladspa plugins?, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Aug 27, 3:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Categorizing Ladspa plugins?, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Aug 27, 3:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Categorizing Ladspa plugins?, Dragan Noveski, (Mon Aug 27, 4:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] Categorizing Ladspa plugins?, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Aug 27, 4:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Categorizing Ladspa plugins?, Matthias , (Mon Aug 27, 6:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] Categorizing Ladspa plugins?, Dragan Noveski, (Mon Aug 27, 4:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Hector Centeno, (Thu Aug 23, 2:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] Edirol FA-101 and output level, Arnold Krille, (Thu Aug 23, 8:12 am)