Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Sebastian Gutsfeld <segoh@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, August 18, 2007 - 11:55 pm

On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Sebastian Gutsfeld wrote:

> Hi William,

This is one of the reasons why the Identity and Null waves were
included for both oscillators and LFOs.

> Regarding the amplifier section: Is it intended that you have to wait

Yes, this is intentional. At one point, I experimented with the
behavior you just described, and found the current behavior to be a
lot more predictable for shorter attack times.

> Is there a way to detune oscillators just a little bit and not only by

Currently, no. A Detune parameter is on the todo list, and will be
implemented down the road as part of a batch of parameter additions.

> Can you explain what the rate parameter in the oscillator sections

The Rate parameter is only used when the Source is set to Tempo or
Tempo+Trig, essentially turning an oscillator into another LFO.

> It would be really nice if the filter lfo section gets replaced with 4

Excellent idea! The filter section really should support more
modulation sources. Filter Resonance should also handle modulation
sources along with Cutoff. I still haven't decided wether to handle
these extra modulations directly, or to implement them through a
more generic parameter modulation matrix. Any feedback on this
issue is highly welcomed.

> Keep up the good work!

And thanks for the constructive feedback. My main goal for new
features is to make PHASEX more useful without making it more
difficult to use.


/* William Weston */

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, William Weston, (Tue Aug 14, 4:29 am)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, Sebastian Gutsfeld, (Wed Aug 15, 1:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, William Weston, (Sat Aug 18, 11:55 pm)
[LAU] Phasex author email ?, Dave Phillips, (Sun Oct 14, 1:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Phasex author email ?, Ken Restivo, (Sun Oct 14, 6:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, Folderol, (Tue Aug 14, 6:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, David Adler, (Tue Aug 14, 3:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, William Weston, (Fri Aug 17, 11:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, Ken Restivo, (Sat Aug 18, 8:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, Sebastian Gutsfeld, (Sat Aug 18, 8:43 am)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, Ken Restivo, (Wed Aug 15, 1:00 am)