Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Sebastian Gutsfeld <segoh@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, August 18, 2007 - 11:55 pm

On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Sebastian Gutsfeld wrote:

> Hi William,

This is one of the reasons why the Identity and Null waves were
included for both oscillators and LFOs.

> Regarding the amplifier section: Is it intended that you have to wait

Yes, this is intentional. At one point, I experimented with the
behavior you just described, and found the current behavior to be a
lot more predictable for shorter attack times.

> Is there a way to detune oscillators just a little bit and not only by

Currently, no. A Detune parameter is on the todo list, and will be
implemented down the road as part of a batch of parameter additions.

> Can you explain what the rate parameter in the oscillator sections

The Rate parameter is only used when the Source is set to Tempo or
Tempo+Trig, essentially turning an oscillator into another LFO.

> It would be really nice if the filter lfo section gets replaced with 4

Excellent idea! The filter section really should support more
modulation sources. Filter Resonance should also handle modulation
sources along with Cutoff. I still haven't decided wether to handle
these extra modulations directly, or to implement them through a
more generic parameter modulation matrix. Any feedback on this
issue is highly welcomed.

> Keep up the good work!

And thanks for the constructive feedback. My main goal for new
features is to make PHASEX more useful without making it more
difficult to use.

Cheers,
--ww

--
/* William Weston */

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, William Weston, (Tue Aug 14, 4:29 am)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, Sebastian Gutsfeld, (Wed Aug 15, 1:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, William Weston, (Sat Aug 18, 11:55 pm)
[LAU] Phasex author email ?, Dave Phillips, (Sun Oct 14, 1:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Phasex author email ?, Ken Restivo, (Sun Oct 14, 6:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, Folderol, (Tue Aug 14, 6:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, David Adler, (Tue Aug 14, 3:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, William Weston, (Fri Aug 17, 11:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, Ken Restivo, (Sat Aug 18, 8:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, Sebastian Gutsfeld, (Sat Aug 18, 8:43 am)
Re: [LAU] PHASEX-0.11.1, Ken Restivo, (Wed Aug 15, 1:00 am)