linuxaudio.org

Am 2007-08-14 05:55:25, schrieb Chris McCormick:

quoted text
> My vote is for people to 'reply to all' when they want to reply to

> all/list, and 'reply' when they want to reply just to the sender (keep

> it how it is right now, as is supported in all mail clients).

The problem is, that most peoples are to sick or lazzy to remove the

Private-Address when using Reply-To-All.  I receive per day 10-20

Carbon Copies and sometime I was wondering WHY the message does NOT

APPEAR in the lists...  Argh!!!
I am subscribed with TWO E-Mails on this list, One which suck the

messages and is 100% SPAM-FREE and then the second, which I use to

post here, which receive per day between 500 and 38.000 SPAMs.
I have configured my procmail/MUA, that if I am IN the LAU/LAD folder

I use the List-Reply but if I am in my "linux4michelle" folder I use

"Reply" which mean, if someone use "Reply-To-All" and do not remove

my E-Mail I get it twice and since I check "linux4michelle" before=20

"LAU/LAD" I will end up in PM's.
      I am voting for a "Driver-License" for the Internet-Use.
Greetings

    Michelle Konzack

    Systemadministrator

    Tamay Dogan Network

    Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--=20

Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/

##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################

Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886

                   50, rue de Soultz         MSN LinuxMichi

0033/6/61925193    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)