linuxaudio.org

i second that. i have been going thru a lot of source code (i have it all on

my hd anyway, so might as well) in the hopes of picking up on how to

program. strange place to start i know. but important programs like ghostess

(which i realize isn't meant to be a full-blown dssi host, but is the best

"simple" option atm) really need to be lash compliant in order to be fully

usable.
of course, a wishlist could go on for ages so i'll stfu ;)
On 5/17/07, James Stone  wrote:

quoted text
>

> Just wondered if anyone has considered adding Lash compatibility

> to ghostess? It would really make seq24 an even more amazing

> program than it is already....

>

> It is a shame more linux audio apps have not picked up on lash.

> IMHO it is one of the key things preventing linux audio from

> steaming ahead of the competition..

>

> I would be more than happy to put in time to help with this, if

> there is anything I can do.. I am afraid my c skills are rather

> poor though, and I would not know where to start with this,

> unless someone could point me to some nice example code!

>

> Anyway, please don't read this post as moaning. It is just

> written with the earnest hope of improving the situation with

> linux audio.

>

> James

> _______________________________________________

> Linux-audio-user mailing list

> Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user

>

--

james/everamzah