Re: [LAU] Lash compatibility...

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, May 18, 2007 - 3:36 am

i second that. i have been going thru a lot of source code (i have it all on
my hd anyway, so might as well) in the hopes of picking up on how to
program. strange place to start i know. but important programs like ghostess
(which i realize isn't meant to be a full-blown dssi host, but is the best
"simple" option atm) really need to be lash compliant in order to be fully
usable.

of course, a wishlist could go on for ages so i'll stfu ;)

On 5/17/07, James Stone wrote:

--
james/everamzah

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Lash compatibility..., James Stone, (Fri May 18, 12:42 am)
Re: [LAU] Lash compatibility..., James, (Fri May 18, 3:36 am)
Re: [LAU] Lash compatibility..., Paul Coccoli, (Fri May 18, 11:51 am)
Re: [LAU] Lash compatibility..., James Stone, (Fri May 18, 1:08 pm)