linuxaudio.org

On 4/10/07, Florian Schmidt  wrote:

quoted text
> On Tuesday 10 April 2007, Dave Robillard wrote:

> > On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 21:52 +0100, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:

> > > On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 10:36 +0300, David Baron wrote:

> > > > Is it really necessary? Can we say the same thing in a nicer manner?

> > > > Maybe a hundred posts one after another: That must suck, et al. I think

> > > > folks of our intelligence and talent can do better.

> > >

> > > Since when is "suck" classed as "foul language"?

> >

> > Heh, no kidding... this thread is just hilarious.  All this over

> > "sucks"!

> >

> > Wow, guys.  Just.... wow.

> >

> > -DR-

> >

> >

> > P.S. This thread sucks

>

> It reminds me of my highschool year in the U.S. When parents and children were

> together no one used any "foul language", but when each of them were on their

> own, all you would hear was "fuck", "shit", "damn", and "suck", regularly

> used in normal conversation (though i have to admit that the kids used them a

> little more often than the parents).

>

> I often had to laugh about this :) It seemed so silly to me.

My friends loved coming over to my place because my mom swore and

belched and let them too.  You're right, it is silly.
-Chuckk
"Ever tell your kids you're glad that they can think?

Ever say you love them, ever let them watch you drink?"

-Frank Zappa
--

http://www.badmuthahubbard.com