Re: [linux-audio-user] High Resolution Timing

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, March 22, 2007 - 3:47 pm

On 3/22/07, Florian Schmidt wrote:

No, it's not. And it's utterly trivial to generate way more than 1024
interrupts per second as an unprivileged user already. I think it's
better to just raise it to a useful value.

Lee

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[linux-audio-user] High Resolution Timing, David Baron, (Thu Mar 22, 10:02 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] High Resolution Timing, Lee Revell, (Thu Mar 22, 3:11 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] High Resolution Timing, Florian Schmidt, (Thu Mar 22, 3:24 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] High Resolution Timing, Lee Revell, (Thu Mar 22, 3:47 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] High Resolution Timing, Florian Schmidt, (Thu Mar 22, 5:08 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] High Resolution Timing, Dragan Noveski, (Fri Mar 23, 2:41 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] High Resolution Timing, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Sat Mar 24, 10:10 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] High Resolution Timing, Florian Schmidt, (Sat Mar 24, 10:40 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] High Resolution Timing, Garett Shulman, (Thu Mar 22, 3:45 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] High Resolution Timing, Dragan Noveski, (Thu Mar 22, 10:23 am)
[linux-audio-user] Re: High Resolution Timing, Ismael Valladolid Torres, (Thu Mar 22, 12:39 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] High Resolution Timing, Florian Schmidt, (Thu Mar 22, 10:36 am)