On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 21:58:54 +0100
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:52:42PM +0000, Chris Cannam wrote:
OK, I can see the improvements although I wouldn't have thought of then
I agree that linux.audio should *not* be inside the box. I would
suggest that it shouldn't be regarded as part of the logo.
Incidentally I read once that a logo can stand by itself as an
eye-catcher. There is no need for it have any obvious connection to the
'product' it advertises. Two examples that spring to mind immediately
are the golly that used to be on Robertsons Jam and the Philips logo.
Will J G