Re: [linux-audio-user] mp3 patent / microsoft

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 8:59 pm

>

I am not certain I agree with you at all, unless you are trying to use
it as an example of how broken things get.

MS paid for rights from whom they thought owned the patent, as did many
others. While I personally think patents are in fact very screwed up,
this case seems even more screwed up as the people paid have for quite
some time been considered to have owned the patent and should have applied.

Seablade

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[linux-audio-user] mp3 patent / microsoft, Juhana Sadeharju, (Wed Feb 28, 10:00 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] mp3 patent / microsoft, Lee Revell, (Wed Feb 28, 5:45 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] mp3 patent / microsoft, Thomas Vecchione, (Wed Feb 28, 8:59 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] mp3 patent / microsoft, Vince Werber, (Wed Feb 28, 9:29 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] mp3 patent / microsoft, david, (Wed Feb 28, 10:09 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] mp3 patent / microsoft, Lee Revell, (Wed Feb 28, 9:12 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] mp3 patent / microsoft, Thomas Vecchione, (Wed Feb 28, 10:21 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] mp3 patent / microsoft, Lee Revell, (Wed Feb 28, 11:11 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] mp3 patent / microsoft, chris beagles, (Wed Feb 28, 6:45 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] mp3 patent / microsoft, we are, (Wed Feb 28, 11:55 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] mp3 patent / microsoft, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Wed Feb 28, 5:30 pm)